lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:56:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
To:     Markus Elfring <>
Cc:     Dinghao Liu <>,,,,,
        Adham Abozaeid <>,
        Ajay Singh <>,
        Claudiu Beznea <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Kalle Valo <>, Kangjie Lu <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: Fix memory leak in wilc_bus_probe

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:47:59PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > When devm_clk_get() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, spi_priv
> > should be freed just like when wilc_cfg80211_init() fails.
> How do you think about to choose an imperative wording for
> a corresponding change description?
> Regards,
> Markus


This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.


greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists