lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818204540.2a278200@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:45:40 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Bin Luo <luobin9@...wei.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Danielle Ratson <danieller@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 1/4] devlink: check flash_update parameter support
 in net core

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:28:15 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
>  struct devlink_ops {
> +	/**
> +	 * @supported_flash_update_params:
> +	 * mask of parameters supported by the driver's .flash_update
> +	 * implemementation.
> +	 */
> +	u32 supported_flash_update_params;

To be sure - this doesn't generate W=1 warnings?

Sadly the posting confused patchwork series grouping and my build tester
(I think it's the iproute patches mixed with the kernel stuff).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ