lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:33:23 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, George Spelvin <lkml@....org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DRAFT PATCH] random32: make prandom_u32() output unpredictable

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:05:49AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> We have the same defines for K0 and K1 in include/linux/prandom.h and
> lib/random32.c?
> More room for simplifications?

Definitely, I'm not surprized at all. As I said, the purpose was to
discuss around the proposal, not much more. If we think it's the way
to go, some major lifting is required. I just don't want to invest
significant time on this if nobody cares.

Thanks!
Willy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists