lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:38:14 +0200
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, brouer@...hat.com,
        echaudro@...hat.com, sameehj@...zon.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing
 the xdp buffer to eBPF layer

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Update multi-buffer bit (mb) in xdp_buff to notify XDP/eBPF layer and
> XDP remote drivers if this is a "non-linear" XDP buffer
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 832bbb8b05c8..36a3defa63fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -2170,11 +2170,14 @@ mvneta_run_xdp(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
>  	       struct bpf_prog *prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>  	       u32 frame_sz, struct mvneta_stats *stats)
>  {
> +	struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
>  	unsigned int len, data_len, sync;
>  	u32 ret, act;
>  
>  	len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start - pp->rx_offset_correction;
>  	data_len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> +
> +	xdp->mb = !!sinfo->nr_frags;

But this set is not utilizing it from BPF side in any way. Personally I
would like to see this as a part of work where BPF program would actually
be taught how to rely on xdp->mb. Especially after John's comment in other
patch.

>  	act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, xdp);
>  
>  	/* Due xdp_adjust_tail: DMA sync for_device cover max len CPU touch */
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists