[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CEsC2h-oEdZOPTkUQ4WfFL0yyYu9dE5UscEVpLyMLrCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:09:34 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > By the way, as a videobuf2 reviewer, I'd appreciate being CC'd on any
> > > > series related to the subsystem-facing DMA API changes, since
> > > > videobuf2 is one of the biggest users of it.
> > >
> > > The cc list is too long - I cc lists and key maintainers. As a reviewer
> > > should should watch your subsystems lists closely.
> >
> > Well, I guess we can disagree on this, because there is no clear
> > policy. I'm listed in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem and I
> > believe the purpose of the file is to list the people to CC on
> > relevant patches. We're all overloaded with work and having to look
> > through the huge volume of mailing lists like linux-media doesn't help
> > and thus I'd still appreciate being added on CC.
>
> I'm happy to Cc and active participant in the discussion. I'm not
> going to add all reviewers because even with the trimmed CC list
> I'm already hitting the number of receipients limit on various lists.
Fair enough.
We'll make your job easier and just turn my MAINTAINERS entry into a
maintainer. :)
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists