[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200821182321.dtkf5wpi4pukbq3w@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:23:21 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 28/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory
accounting infra for bpf maps
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:01:32AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> index 473665cac67e..49d1dcaf7999 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> @@ -26,17 +26,12 @@ __u32 g_line = 0;
> return 0; \
> })
>
> -struct bpf_map_memory {
> - __u32 pages;
> -} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> -
> struct bpf_map {
> enum bpf_map_type map_type;
> __u32 key_size;
> __u32 value_size;
> __u32 max_entries;
> __u32 id;
> - struct bpf_map_memory memory;
> } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
hmm. Did you build selftests?
progs/map_ptr_kern.c:45:14: error: no member named 'memory' in 'struct bpf_map'
VERIFY(map->memory.pages > 0);
~~~ ^
progs/map_ptr_kern.c:25:8: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists