netdev - Re: [PATCH next] net: add option to not create fall-back tunnels in root-ns as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200821.143553.1454267475258459257.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     maze@...gle.com
Cc:     maheshb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, mahesh@...dewar.net, jianyang@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] net: add option to not create fall-back tunnels
 in root-ns as well

From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:25:20 -0700

> If no kernel command line option is specified, should the default
> be to maintain compatibility, or do you think it's okay to make
> the default be no extra interfaces?  They can AFAICT always be added
> manually via 'ip link add' netlink commands.

You can't change current default behavior, so the answer should be
obvious right?