netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y2m7gq86.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
Date:   Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:25 +0200
From:   Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

On 2020-08-21 09:23 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:

> Hi Sven,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, did you still see this after:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200803131948.41736-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com/
> ??

That patch is apparently already in 5.9-rc1 as commit 80fbbb1672e7, so
yes I'm still seeing it.

Cheers,
       Sven

> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:21 AM Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de> wrote:
>
>> On 2020-07-29 21:27 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (i386
>> defconfig)
>> > failed like this:
>> >
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: net/core/fib_rules.o: in function
>> `fib_rules_lookup':
>> > fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5c6): undefined reference to `fib6_rule_match'
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5d8): undefined reference to
>> `fib6_rule_match'
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x64d): undefined reference to
>> `fib6_rule_action'
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x662): undefined reference to
>> `fib6_rule_action'
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x67a): undefined reference to
>> `fib6_rule_suppress'
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x68d): undefined reference to
>> `fib6_rule_suppress'
>>
>> FWIW, I saw these errors in 5.9-rc1 today, so the fix in commit
>> 41d707b7332f ("fib: fix fib_rules_ops indirect calls wrappers") was
>> apparently not sufficient.
>>
>> ,----
>> | $ grep IPV6 .config
>> | CONFIG_IPV6=m
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6 is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_ILA is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_VTI is not set
>> | CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD is not set
>> | CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y
>> | CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m
>> | CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC is not set
>> | # CONFIG_IPV6_RPL_LWTUNNEL is not set
>> | # CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6 is not set
>> | # CONFIG_NF_TPROXY_IPV6 is not set
>> | # CONFIG_NF_DUP_IPV6 is not set
>> | # CONFIG_NF_REJECT_IPV6 is not set
>> | # CONFIG_NF_LOG_IPV6 is not set
>> | CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=m
>> `----
>>
>> > Caused by commit
>> >
>> >   b9aaec8f0be5 ("fib: use indirect call wrappers in the most common
>> fib_rules_ops")
>> >
>> > # CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is not set
>> >
>> > I have reverted that commit for today.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>        Sven
>>