netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] Move MDIO drivers into there own directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200822.131604.2154905344041600633.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] Move MDIO drivers into there own
 directory

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:51:44 +0200

> I just got a 0-day warning. I will send a fixup soon.

I also get this when I simply type make after your changes:

WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PCS_XPCS
  Depends on [n]: NETDEVICES [=y] && PCS_DEVICE [=n]
  Selected by [m]:
  - STMMAC_ETH [=m] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] && NET_VENDOR_STMICRO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && HAS_DMA [=y]

And then it prompts me for:

PCS device drivers (PCS_DEVICE) [N/m/y/?] (NEW)

This is on a tree that had an allmodconfig config before your changes.

I really don't think users should get prompted for things like this just because
the source files were rearranged into different directories.

Why don't you submit a full v4 once you've resolved all of these items?

Thanks!