[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200824135533.53e98ba0@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...dia.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] mlxsw: Misc updates
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:06:21 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
> This patch set includes various updates for mlxsw.
>
> Patches #1-#4 adjust the default burst size of packet trap policers to
> conform to Spectrum-{2,3} requirements. The corresponding selftest is
> also adjusted so that it could reliably pass on these platforms.
>
> Patch #5 adjusts a selftest so that it could pass with both old and new
> versions of mausezahn.
>
> Patch #6 significantly reduces the runtime of tc-police scale test by
> changing the preference and masks of the used tc filters.
>
> Patch #7 prevents the driver from trying to set invalid ethtool link
> modes.
LGTM, so FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
5 and 7 could have gone to net IMHO. Especially 7 - do I misinterpret
that it exposes speeds which are not in fact supported? The commit
message is not very clear on impact, and how the quoted error is
triggered.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists