netdev - Re: Severe performance regression in "net: macsec: preserve ingress frame ordering"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:01:42 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "Van Leeuwen, Pascal" <pvanleeuwen@...bus.com>
Cc:     Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        Scott Dial <scott@...ttdial.com>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ryan Cox <ryan_cox@....edu>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "ebiggers@...gle.com" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Severe performance regression in "net: macsec: preserve ingress
 frame ordering"

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:07:26AM +0000, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> No need to point this out to me as we're the number one supplier of inline MACsec IP :-)
> In fact, the Microsemi PHY solution you mention is ours, major parts of that design were
> even created by these 2 hands here.

Oh,  O.K.

Do you know of other silicon vendors which are using the same IP?
Maybe we can encourage them to share the driver, rather than re-invent
the wheel, which often happens when nobody realises it is basically
the same core with a different wrapper.

Thanks
	Andrew