[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200824130142.GN2588906@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:01:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Van Leeuwen, Pascal" <pvanleeuwen@...bus.com>
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Scott Dial <scott@...ttdial.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Ryan Cox <ryan_cox@....edu>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
"ebiggers@...gle.com" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Severe performance regression in "net: macsec: preserve ingress
frame ordering"
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:07:26AM +0000, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> No need to point this out to me as we're the number one supplier of inline MACsec IP :-)
> In fact, the Microsemi PHY solution you mention is ours, major parts of that design were
> even created by these 2 hands here.
Oh, O.K.
Do you know of other silicon vendors which are using the same IP?
Maybe we can encourage them to share the driver, rather than re-invent
the wheel, which often happens when nobody realises it is basically
the same core with a different wrapper.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists