lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:01:42 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: "Van Leeuwen, Pascal" <pvanleeuwen@...bus.com> Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, Scott Dial <scott@...ttdial.com>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, Ryan Cox <ryan_cox@....edu>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>, "ebiggers@...gle.com" <ebiggers@...gle.com> Subject: Re: Severe performance regression in "net: macsec: preserve ingress frame ordering" On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:07:26AM +0000, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote: > No need to point this out to me as we're the number one supplier of inline MACsec IP :-) > In fact, the Microsemi PHY solution you mention is ours, major parts of that design were > even created by these 2 hands here. Oh, O.K. Do you know of other silicon vendors which are using the same IP? Maybe we can encourage them to share the driver, rather than re-invent the wheel, which often happens when nobody realises it is basically the same core with a different wrapper. Thanks Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists