[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNVzkbuc2Wx0dOd_JFEiNG+D9FFm0+PFrs2CFU7-x=F5kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:56:42 +0800
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: openvswitch: refactor flow free function
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:09 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:36:01 +0800
>
> > To avoid a bug when deleting flows in the future, add
> > BUG_ON in flush flows function.
>
> BUG_ON() is too severe, I think WARN_ON() or similar are sufficient
> because the kernel can try to continue operating if this condition is
> detected.
>
> And you can force the values to zero in such a situation.
Thanks, David
will be changed to:
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 0473758035b5..5378282e1d13 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -492,8 +492,11 @@ void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
}
}
- BUG_ON(table->count != 0);
- BUG_ON(table->ufid_count != 0);
+ if (WARN_ON(table->count != 0 ||
+ table->ufid_count != 0)) {
+ table->count = 0;
+ table->ufid_count = 0
+ }
}
> Thank you.
--
Best regards, Tonghao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists