[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+khW7iGs=tN2FT=rEiPZMQ_Z9=sqhRe4dY7dKbVoViwX666BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:05:22 -0700
From: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id
Yonghong,
An update on this thread. I successfully reproduced this issue on a
8.2.0 gcc compiler, It looks like gcc 4.9 did not have this issue. I
was also using clang which did not show this bug.
It seems having a DW_AT_specification that refers to another
DW_TAG_variable isn't handled in pahole. I have a (maybe hacky) pahole
patch as fix and let me clean it up and post for review soon.
Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists