| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200825232003.2877030-2-udippant@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:20:00 -0700
From: Udip Pant <udippant@...com>
To: Udip Pant <udippant@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf: verifier: use target program's type for access verifications
This patch adds changes in verifier to make decisions such as granting
of read / write access or enforcement of return code status based on
the program type of the target program while using dynamic program
extension (of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT).
The BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT type can be used to extend types such as XDP, SKB
and others. Since the BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT program type on itself is just a
placeholder for those, we need this extended check for those extended
programs to actually work with proper access, while using this option.
Specifically, it introduces following changes:
- may_access_direct_pkt_data:
allow access to packet data based on the target prog
- check_return_code:
enforce return code based on the target prog
(currently, this check is skipped for EXT program)
- check_ld_abs:
check for 'may_access_skb' based on the target prog
- check_map_prog_compatibility:
enforce the map compatibility check based on the target prog
- may_update_sockmap:
allow sockmap update based on the target prog
Some other occurrences of prog->type is left as it without replacing
with the 'resolved' type:
- do_check_common() and check_attach_btf_id():
already have specific logic to handle the EXT prog type
- jit_subprogs() and bpf_check():
Not changed for jit compilation or while inferring env->ops
Next few patches in this series include selftests for some of these cases.
Signed-off-by: Udip Pant <udippant@...com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 38748794518e..95c715508034 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2625,11 +2625,19 @@ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
#define MAX_PACKET_OFF 0xffff
+static enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return prog->aux->linked_prog ? prog->aux->linked_prog->type
+ : prog->type;
+}
+
static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
enum bpf_access_type t)
{
- switch (env->prog->type) {
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
+
+ switch (prog_type) {
/* Program types only with direct read access go here! */
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT:
@@ -4181,7 +4189,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id)
{
enum bpf_attach_type eatype = env->prog->expected_attach_type;
- enum bpf_prog_type type = env->prog->type;
+ enum bpf_prog_type type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem)
return false;
@@ -7366,7 +7374,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code);
int i, err;
- if (!may_access_skb(env->prog->type)) {
+ if (!may_access_skb(resolve_prog_type(env->prog))) {
verbose(env, "BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] instructions not allowed for this program type\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -7454,11 +7462,12 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
const struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(env->prog);
int err;
/* LSM and struct_ops func-ptr's return type could be "void" */
- if ((env->prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
- env->prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) &&
+ if ((prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
+ prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) &&
!prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type)
return 0;
@@ -7477,7 +7486,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EACCES;
}
- switch (env->prog->type) {
+ switch (prog_type) {
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR:
if (env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_UDP4_RECVMSG ||
env->prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_RECVMSG ||
@@ -9233,6 +9242,7 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(prog);
/*
* Validate that trace type programs use preallocated hash maps.
*
@@ -9250,8 +9260,8 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
* now, but warnings are emitted so developers are made aware of
* the unsafety and can fix their programs before this is enforced.
*/
- if (is_tracing_prog_type(prog->type) && !is_preallocated_map(map)) {
- if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) {
+ if (is_tracing_prog_type(prog_type) && !is_preallocated_map(map)) {
+ if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) {
verbose(env, "perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -9263,8 +9273,8 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose(env, "trace type programs with run-time allocated hash maps are unsafe. Switch to preallocated hash maps.\n");
}
- if ((is_tracing_prog_type(prog->type) ||
- prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER) &&
+ if ((is_tracing_prog_type(prog_type) ||
+ prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER) &&
map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) {
verbose(env, "tracing progs cannot use bpf_spin_lock yet\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -9976,7 +9986,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |
BPF_SIZE((insn)->code);
env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
- } else if (env->prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
+ } else if (resolve_prog_type(env->prog) != BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
verbose(env, "Writes through BTF pointers are not allowed\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists