[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825090933.GN13023@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:09:33 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22 binding and reset-gpios
Hi All,
I am using the ethernet phy binding here that looks like:
ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <1>;
eee-broken-1000t;
reset-gpios = <&gpio4 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
It seems the "reset-gpios" is inherently broken in Linux. With the above
in one way or the other we end up in of_mdiobus_register_phy() where we
have:
if (!is_c45 && !of_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
phy = phy_device_create(mdio, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
else
phy = get_phy_device(mdio, addr, is_c45);
get_phy_device() tries to read the phy_id from the MDIO bus.
Unfortunately the "reset-gpios" property is only handled later in
phy_device_register(), so it can only work when the bootloader has left
the reset GPIO deasserted. Note it works when of_get_phy_id() returns
the phy_id, which is the case when the phy_id is explicitly given with
"ethernet-phy-idxxxx.yyyy", but giving the exact phy_id shouldn't be
mandatory, right?
I think the phy_id is unknown at phy_device_create() time, so I looked
into removing the phy_id argument there and specifying it elsewhere,
maybe by adding a phy_device_set_id() function. Another point is that
phy_device_create() currently calls phy_request_driver_module() to get
the driver modules for a given phy_id. That would have to be called
later as well. Is this the path to go or are there any other ideas how
to solve this issue?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists