netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] net: dsa: hellcreek: Add TAPRIO offloading support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:46:12 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc:     Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Kamil Alkhouri <kamil.alkhouri@...offenburg.de>,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] net: dsa: hellcreek: Add TAPRIO offloading support

Hi Vinicius,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:45:50PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> writes:
> >
> > With TAPRIO traffic classes and the mapping to queues can be
> > configured. The switch can also map traffic classes. That sounded like a
> > good match to me.
>
> The only reason I could think that you would need this that *right now*
> taprio has pretty glaring oversight: that in the offload parameters each entry
> 'gate_mask' reference the "Traffic Class" (i.e. bit 0 is Traffic Class
> 0), and it really should be the HW queue.
>

Sorry, but could you please explain why having the gate_mask reference
the traffic classes is a glaring oversight, and how changing it would
help here?

Also, Kurt, could you please explain what the
HR_PRTCCFG_PCP_TC_MAP_SHIFT field in HR_PRTCCFG is doing?
To me, it appears that it's configuring ingress QoS classification on
the port (and the reason why this is strange to me is because you're
applying this configuration through an egress qdisc), but I want to make
sure I'm not misunderstanding.

Thanks,
-Vladimir