| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200827220114.69225-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:01:14 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, josef@...icpanda.com, bpoirier@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add sleepable tests
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Modify few tests to sanity test sleepable bpf functionality.
Running 'bench trig-fentry-sleep' vs 'bench trig-fentry' and 'perf report':
sleepable with SRCU:
3.86% bench [k] __srcu_read_unlock
3.22% bench [k] __srcu_read_lock
0.92% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry_sleep
0.50% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10297
0.26% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable
0.21% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable
sleepable with RCU_TRACE:
0.79% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry_sleep
0.72% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10381
0.31% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable
0.29% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable
non-sleepable with RCU:
0.88% bench [k] bpf_prog_740d4210cdcd99a3_bench_trigger_fentry
0.84% bench [k] bpf_trampoline_10297
0.13% bench [k] __bpf_prog_enter
0.12% bench [k] __bpf_prog_exit
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 17 +++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c | 9 +++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/trigger_bench.c | 7 ++
5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index 944ad4721c83..1a427685a8a8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ extern const struct bench bench_trig_tp;
extern const struct bench bench_trig_rawtp;
extern const struct bench bench_trig_kprobe;
extern const struct bench bench_trig_fentry;
+extern const struct bench bench_trig_fentry_sleep;
extern const struct bench bench_trig_fmodret;
extern const struct bench bench_rb_libbpf;
extern const struct bench bench_rb_custom;
@@ -338,6 +339,7 @@ static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
&bench_trig_rawtp,
&bench_trig_kprobe,
&bench_trig_fentry,
+ &bench_trig_fentry_sleep,
&bench_trig_fmodret,
&bench_rb_libbpf,
&bench_rb_custom,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
index 49c22832f216..2a0b6c9885a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
@@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ static void trigger_fentry_setup()
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_fentry);
}
+static void trigger_fentry_sleep_setup()
+{
+ setup_ctx();
+ attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_fentry_sleep);
+}
+
static void trigger_fmodret_setup()
{
setup_ctx();
@@ -155,6 +161,17 @@ const struct bench bench_trig_fentry = {
.report_final = hits_drops_report_final,
};
+const struct bench bench_trig_fentry_sleep = {
+ .name = "trig-fentry-sleep",
+ .validate = trigger_validate,
+ .setup = trigger_fentry_sleep_setup,
+ .producer_thread = trigger_producer,
+ .consumer_thread = trigger_consumer,
+ .measure = trigger_measure,
+ .report_progress = hits_drops_report_progress,
+ .report_final = hits_drops_report_final,
+};
+
const struct bench bench_trig_fmodret = {
.name = "trig-fmodret",
.validate = trigger_validate,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
index b17eb2045c1d..6ab29226c99b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <malloc.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include "lsm.skel.h"
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)
{
struct lsm *skel = NULL;
int err, duration = 0;
+ int buf = 1234;
skel = lsm__open_and_load();
if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "lsm skeleton failed\n"))
@@ -81,6 +83,13 @@ void test_test_lsm(void)
CHECK(skel->bss->mprotect_count != 1, "mprotect_count",
"mprotect_count = %d\n", skel->bss->mprotect_count);
+ syscall(__NR_setdomainname, &buf, -2L);
+ syscall(__NR_setdomainname, 0, -3L);
+ syscall(__NR_setdomainname, ~0L, -4L);
+
+ CHECK(skel->bss->copy_test != 3, "copy_test",
+ "copy_test = %d\n", skel->bss->copy_test);
+
close_prog:
lsm__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
index b4598d4bc4f7..49fa6ca99755 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
@@ -9,16 +9,41 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <errno.h>
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} array SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} hash SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} lru_hash SEC(".maps");
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
int monitored_pid = 0;
int mprotect_count = 0;
int bprm_count = 0;
-SEC("lsm/file_mprotect")
+SEC("lsm.s/file_mprotect")
int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, int ret)
{
+ char args[64];
+ __u32 key = 0;
+ __u64 *value;
+
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
@@ -28,6 +53,18 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
is_stack = (vma->vm_start <= vma->vm_mm->start_stack &&
vma->vm_end >= vma->vm_mm->start_stack);
+ bpf_copy_from_user(args, sizeof(args), (void *)vma->vm_mm->arg_start);
+
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array, &key);
+ if (value)
+ *value = 0;
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash, &key);
+ if (value)
+ *value = 0;
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lru_hash, &key);
+ if (value)
+ *value = 0;
+
if (is_stack && monitored_pid == pid) {
mprotect_count++;
ret = -EPERM;
@@ -36,7 +73,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
return ret;
}
-SEC("lsm/bprm_committed_creds")
+SEC("lsm.s/bprm_committed_creds")
int BPF_PROG(test_void_hook, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
__u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
@@ -46,3 +83,28 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_void_hook, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return 0;
}
+SEC("lsm/task_free") /* lsm/ is ok, lsm.s/ fails */
+int BPF_PROG(test_task_free, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int copy_test = 0;
+
+SEC("fentry.s/__x64_sys_setdomainname")
+int BPF_PROG(test_sys_setdomainname, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ void *ptr = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1(regs);
+ int len = PT_REGS_PARM2(regs);
+ int buf = 0;
+ long ret;
+
+ ret = bpf_copy_from_user(&buf, sizeof(buf), ptr);
+ if (len == -2 && ret == 0 && buf == 1234)
+ copy_test++;
+ if (len == -3 && ret == -EFAULT)
+ copy_test++;
+ if (len == -4 && ret == -EFAULT)
+ copy_test++;
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/trigger_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/trigger_bench.c
index 8b36b6640e7e..9a4d09590b3d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/trigger_bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/trigger_bench.c
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@ int bench_trigger_fentry(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fentry.s/__x64_sys_getpgid")
+int bench_trigger_fentry_sleep(void *ctx)
+{
+ __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("fmod_ret/__x64_sys_getpgid")
int bench_trigger_fmodret(void *ctx)
{
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists