[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200827223250.2045503-4-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:32:50 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC -next 3/3] net: make sure napi_list is safe for RCU traversal
netpoll needs to traverse dev->napi_list under RCU, make
sure it uses the right iterator and that removal from this
list is handled safely.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 623060907132..dfb4a4137eea 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6656,7 +6656,7 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
return;
napi_hash_del(napi);
- list_del_init(&napi->dev_list);
+ list_del_rcu(&napi->dev_list);
napi_free_frags(napi);
flush_gro_hash(napi);
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 2338753e936b..c310c7c1cef7 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int netpoll_owner_active(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct napi_struct *napi;
- list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
if (napi->poll_owner == smp_processor_id())
return 1;
}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists