[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200831165054.6d16f0dd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:50:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] ionic: smaller coalesce default
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:35:55 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> index 9e2ac2b8a082..2b2eb5f2a0e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> #define IONIC_DEF_TXRX_DESC 4096
> #define IONIC_LIFS_MAX 1024
> #define IONIC_WATCHDOG_SECS 5
> -#define IONIC_ITR_COAL_USEC_DEFAULT 64
> +#define IONIC_ITR_COAL_USEC_DEFAULT 8
8 us interrupt coalescing does not hurt general operations?! No way.
It's your customers who'll get hurt here, so your call, but I seriously
doubt this. Unless the unit is not usec?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists