[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901134949.GB11944@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:49:49 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] MIPS/jazzdma: decouple from dma-direct
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 08:55:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The jazzdma ops implement support for a very basic IOMMU. Thus we really
> should not use the dma-direct code that takes physical address limits
> into account. This survived through the great MIPS DMA ops cleanup mostly
> because I was lazy, but now it is time to fully split the implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> arch/mips/jazz/jazzdma.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists