[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901143512.25424-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:35:12 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <borisp@...dia.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>, <leon@...nel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <tariqt@...lanox.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Avoid kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) under spinlock
A spin lock is held before kzalloc, it may sleep with holding
the spinlock, so we should use GFP_ATOMIC instead.
This is detected by coccinelle.
Fixes: 0419d8c9d8f8 ("net/mlx5e: kTLS, Add kTLS RX resync support")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_rx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_rx.c
index acf6d80a6bb7..1a32435acac3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ktls_rx.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ resync_post_get_progress_params(struct mlx5e_icosq *sq,
int err;
u16 pi;
- buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
+ buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (unlikely(!buf)) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_out;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists