netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/28] 53c700: improve non-coherent DMA handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1598973776.4238.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:22:56 -0700
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/28] 53c700: improve non-coherent DMA handling

On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:05 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:52:40AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I think this looks mostly OK, except for one misnamed parameter
> > below. Unfortunately, the last non-coherent parisc was the 700
> > series and I no longer own a box, so I can't test that part of it
> > (I can fire up the C360 to test it on a coherent arch).
> 
> I have a 715/50 that probably hasn't been powered on in 15 years if
> you need something that old to test on (I believe the 725/100 uses
> the 7100LC and so is coherent).  I'll need to set up a cross-compiler 
> ...

I'm not going to say no to actual testing, but it's going to be a world
of pain getting something so old going.  I do have a box of older
systems I keep for architectural testing that I need to rummage around
in ... I just have a vague memory that my 715 actually caught fire a
decade ago and had to be disposed of.

James