[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01bc7a06-e294-7cfe-d284-1b7e834ba90f@toxicpanda.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:18:18 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, kernel-team@...com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: avoid iterating duplicated files for
task_file iterator
On 8/28/20 1:38 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> Currently, task_file iterator iterates all files from all tasks.
> This may potentially visit a lot of duplicated files if there are
> many tasks sharing the same files, e.g., typical pthreads
> where these pthreads and the main thread are sharing the same files.
>
> This patch changed task_file iterator to skip a particular task
> if that task shares the same files as its group_leader (the task
> having the same tgid and also task->tgid == task->pid).
> This will preserve the same result, visiting all files from all
> tasks, and will reduce runtime cost significantl, e.g., if there are
> a lot of pthreads and the process has a lot of open files.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> It would be good if somebody familar with sched code can help check
> whether I missed anything or not (e.g., locks, etc.)
> for the code change
> task->files == task->group_leader->files
>
> Note the change in this patch might have conflicts with
> e60572b8d4c3 ("bpf: Avoid visit same object multiple times")
> which is merged into bpf/net sometimes back.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> index 232df29793e9..0c5c96bb6964 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info {
> };
>
> static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
> - u32 *tid)
> + u32 *tid,
> + bool skip_if_dup_files)
> {
> struct task_struct *task = NULL;
> struct pid *pid;
> @@ -32,7 +33,10 @@ static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
> pid = idr_get_next(&ns->idr, tid);
> if (pid) {
> task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> - if (!task) {
> + if (!task ||
> + (skip_if_dup_files &&
> + task->tgid != task->pid &&
> + task->files == task->group_leader->files)) {
> ++*tid;
> goto retry;
Sorry I only checked the task->files and task->group_leader thing, I forgot to
actually pay attention to what the patch itself was doing.
This will leak task structs, you need something like
if (!task) {
++*tid;
goto retry;
}
if (skip_if_dup_files && etc) {
++*tid;
put_task_struct(task);
goto retry;
}
otherwise you'll leak tasks. Thanks,
Josef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists