[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200901091541.3974FC433C6@smtp.codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:15:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] wireless: marvell: mwifiex: sdio: Move 'static
const
struct's into their own header file
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Only include these tables in the 1 source file they are used.
>
> Fixes hundreds of W=1 warnings!
>
> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>
> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h:59,
> from drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c:22:
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.h:705:41: warning: ‘mwifiex_sdio_sd8801’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> 705 | static const struct mwifiex_sdio_device mwifiex_sdio_sd8801 = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> NB: There were 100's of these - snipped for brevity.
>
> Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>
> Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>
> Cc: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
I don't think static const variables should be in a .h file. Wouldn't
sdio.c be the right place for these? At least from a quick look I got
that impression.
Patch set to Changes Requested.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11728301/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists