| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:14:23 -0400
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] Support for VLAN interface over HSR/PRP
All,
On 9/1/20 3:54 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> This series add support for creating VLAN interface over HSR or
> PRP interface. Typically industrial networks uses VLAN in
> deployment and this capability is needed to support these
> networks.
>
> This is tested using two TI AM572x IDK boards connected back
> to back over CPSW ports (eth0 and eth1).
>
> Following is the setup
>
> Physical Setup
> ++++++++++++++
>
> _______________ (CPSW) _______________
> | |----eth0-----| |
> |TI AM572x IDK1| | TI AM572x IDK2|
> |______________|----eth1-----|_______________|
>
>
> Network Topolgy
> +++++++++++++++
>
> TI AM571x IDK TI AM572x IDK
>
>
> 192.168.100.10 CPSW ports 192.168.100.20
> IDK-1 IDK-2
> hsr0/prp0.100--| 192.168.2.10 |--eth0--| 192.168.2.20 |--hsr0/prp0.100
> |----hsr0/prp0--| |---hsr0/prp0--|
> hsr0/prp0.101--| |--eth1--| |--hsr0/prp0/101
>
> 192.168.101.10 192.168.101.20
>
> Following tests:-
> - create hsr or prp interface and ping the interface IP address
> and verify ping is successful.
> - Create 2 VLANs over hsr or prp interface on both IDKs (VID 100 and
> 101). Ping between the IP address of the VLAN interfaces
> - Do iperf UDP traffic test with server on one IDK and client on the
> other. Do this using 100 and 101 subnet IP addresses
> - Dump /proc/net/vlan/{hsr|prp}0.100 and verify frames are transmitted
> and received at these interfaces.
> - Delete the vlan and hsr/prp interface and verify interfaces are
> removed cleanly.
>
> Logs for IDK-1 at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/NxF83yZFDX/
> Logs for IDK-2 at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/YBXBcsPgVK/
>
> Murali Karicheri (1):
> net: hsr/prp: add vlan support
>
> net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 4 ----
> net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
I am not sure if the packet flow is right for this?
VLAN over HSR frame format is like this.
<Start of Frame><VLAN tag><HSR Tag><IP><CRC>
My ifconfig stats shows both hsr and hsr0.100 interfaces receiving
frames.
So I did a WARN_ON() in HSR driver before frame is forwarded to upper
layer.
a0868495local@...0868495:~/Projects/upstream-kernel$ git diff
diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
index de21df30b0d9..545a3cd8c71b 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
@@ -415,9 +415,11 @@ static void hsr_forward_do(struct hsr_frame_info
*frame)
}
skb->dev = port->dev;
- if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
+ if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER) {
+ if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb))
+ WARN_ON(1);
hsr_deliver_master(skb, port->dev,
frame->node_src);
- else
+ } else
hsr_xmit(skb, port, frame);
}
}
And I get the trace shown below.
[ 275.125431] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/hsr/hsr_forward.c:420
hsr_forward_skb+0x460/0x564
[ 275.133822] Modules linked in: snd_soc_omap_hdmi snd_soc_ti_sdma
snd_soc_core snd_pcm_dmaengine snd_pcm snd_time4
[ 275.199705] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
5.9.0-rc1-00658-g473e463812c2-dirty #8
[ 275.209573] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 275.215703] [<c011177c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b6f0>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 275.223487] [<c010b6f0>] (show_stack) from [<c055690c>]
(dump_stack+0xc4/0xe4)
[ 275.230747] [<c055690c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01386ac>]
(__warn+0xc0/0xf4)
[ 275.237656] [<c01386ac>] (__warn) from [<c0138a3c>]
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0x58/0xb8)
[ 275.245177] [<c0138a3c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c09564bc>]
(hsr_forward_skb+0x460/0x564)
[ 275.253657] [<c09564bc>] (hsr_forward_skb) from [<c0955534>]
(hsr_handle_frame+0x15c/0x190)
[ 275.262047] [<c0955534>] (hsr_handle_frame) from [<c07c6704>]
(__netif_receive_skb_core+0x23c/0xc88)
[ 275.271223] [<c07c6704>] (__netif_receive_skb_core) from [<c07c7180>]
(__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x30/0x74)
[ 275.281266] [<c07c7180>] (__netif_receive_skb_one_core) from
[<c07c72a4>] (netif_receive_skb+0x50/0x1c4)
[ 275.290793] [<c07c72a4>] (netif_receive_skb) from [<c071a55c>]
(cpsw_rx_handler+0x230/0x308)
[ 275.299272] [<c071a55c>] (cpsw_rx_handler) from [<c0715ee8>]
(__cpdma_chan_process+0xf4/0x188)
[ 275.307925] [<c0715ee8>] (__cpdma_chan_process) from [<c0717294>]
(cpdma_chan_process+0x3c/0x5c)
[ 275.316754] [<c0717294>] (cpdma_chan_process) from [<c071dd14>]
(cpsw_rx_mq_poll+0x44/0x98)
[ 275.325145] [<c071dd14>] (cpsw_rx_mq_poll) from [<c07c8ae0>]
(net_rx_action+0xf0/0x400)
[ 275.333185] [<c07c8ae0>] (net_rx_action) from [<c0101370>]
(__do_softirq+0xf0/0x3ac)
[ 275.340965] [<c0101370>] (__do_softirq) from [<c013f5ec>]
(irq_exit+0xa8/0xe4)
[ 275.348224] [<c013f5ec>] (irq_exit) from [<c0199344>]
(__handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xe0)
[ 275.356093] [<c0199344>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c056f8fc>]
(gic_handle_irq+0x4c/0xa8)
[ 275.364481] [<c056f8fc>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0100b6c>]
(__irq_svc+0x6c/0x90)
[ 275.371996] Exception stack(0xc0e01f18 to 0xc0e01f60)
Shouldn't it show vlan_do_receive() ?
if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
if (pt_prev) {
ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
pt_prev = NULL;
}
if (vlan_do_receive(&skb))
goto another_round;
else if (unlikely(!skb))
goto out;
}
Thanks
--
Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists