netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/14] selftests/bpf: convert pyperf, strobemeta, and l4lb_noinline to _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaaJtHNCz-J+XdRzMQbhdbmGwRQ+hnDCEO1VYfUATWJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:58:37 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/14] selftests/bpf: convert pyperf,
 strobemeta, and l4lb_noinline to __noinline

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:45 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:50:01PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
> > index cc615b82b56e..13998aee887f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ typedef struct {
> >       void* co_name; // PyCodeObject.co_name
> >  } FrameData;
> >
> > -static __always_inline void *get_thread_state(void *tls_base, PidData *pidData)
> > +static __noinline void *get_thread_state(void *tls_base, PidData *pidData)
> >  {
> >       void* thread_state;
> >       int key;
> > @@ -154,12 +154,10 @@ struct {
> >       __uint(value_size, sizeof(long long) * 127);
> >  } stackmap SEC(".maps");
> >
> > -#ifdef GLOBAL_FUNC
> > -__attribute__((noinline))
> > -#else
> > -static __always_inline
> > +#ifndef GLOBAL_FUNC
> > +static
> >  #endif
> > -int __on_event(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *ctx)
> > +__noinline int __on_event(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *ctx)
> >  {
> >       uint64_t pid_tgid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
> >       pid_t pid = (pid_t)(pid_tgid >> 32);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strobemeta.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strobemeta.h
> > index ad61b722a9de..d307c67ce52e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strobemeta.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/strobemeta.h
> > @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ struct tls_index {
> >       uint64_t offset;
> >  };
> >
> > -static __always_inline void *calc_location(struct strobe_value_loc *loc,
> > -                                        void *tls_base)
> > +static __noinline void *calc_location(struct strobe_value_loc *loc, void *tls_base)
>
> hmm. this reduces the existing test coverage. Unless I'm misreading it.
> Could you keep existing strobemta tests and add new one?
> With new ifdefs. Like this GLOBAL_FUNC.

Oh, you mean testing single BPF program complexity when everything is
inlined? Yeah, haven't thought about that. Ok, I'll add new variants
with or without subprogram calls.