netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: avoid iterating duplicated files for task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200902023112.1672792-1-yhs@fb.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:31:12 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: avoid iterating duplicated files for task_file iterator

Currently, task_file iterator iterates all files from all tasks.
This may potentially visit a lot of duplicated files if there are
many tasks sharing the same files, e.g., typical pthreads
where these pthreads and the main thread are sharing the same files.

This patch changed task_file iterator to skip a particular task
if that task shares the same files as its group_leader (the task
having the same tgid and also task->tgid == task->pid).
This will preserve the same result, visiting all files from all
tasks, and will reduce runtime cost significantl, e.g., if there are
a lot of pthreads and the process has a lot of open files.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 99af4cea1102..5b6af30bfbcd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info {
 };
 
 static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
-					     u32 *tid)
+					     u32 *tid,
+					     bool skip_if_dup_files)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = NULL;
 	struct pid *pid;
@@ -36,6 +37,12 @@ static struct task_struct *task_seq_get_next(struct pid_namespace *ns,
 		if (!task) {
 			++*tid;
 			goto retry;
+		} else if (skip_if_dup_files && task->tgid != task->pid &&
+			   task->files == task->group_leader->files) {
+			put_task_struct(task);
+			task = NULL;
+			++*tid;
+			goto retry;
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -48,7 +55,7 @@ static void *task_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 	struct bpf_iter_seq_task_info *info = seq->private;
 	struct task_struct *task;
 
-	task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid);
+	task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid, false);
 	if (!task)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -65,7 +72,7 @@ static void *task_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	++*pos;
 	++info->tid;
 	put_task_struct((struct task_struct *)v);
-	task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid);
+	task = task_seq_get_next(info->common.ns, &info->tid, false);
 	if (!task)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -148,7 +155,7 @@ task_file_seq_get_next(struct bpf_iter_seq_task_file_info *info,
 		curr_files = *fstruct;
 		curr_fd = info->fd;
 	} else {
-		curr_task = task_seq_get_next(ns, &curr_tid);
+		curr_task = task_seq_get_next(ns, &curr_tid, true);
 		if (!curr_task)
 			return NULL;
 
-- 
2.24.1