netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: phy: smsc: add phy refclk in support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4be65e9-64b6-81a0-4042-34cd024a137b@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:05:42 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        zhengdejin5@...il.com, richard.leitner@...data.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: phy: smsc: add phy refclk in support



On 9/1/2020 1:24 AM, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Create :) Can you provide me a link? What I can say for now is: This
> solution was used by the micrel driver too and it seems to work. I
> wanted to keep the change smaller/more local because the current
> upstream state is: SMSC-Phy <-> FEC-Host ==> IRQ broken. If your patch
> fixes this too in a more general matter I'm fine with it and we can drop
> this patch but we should fix this as soon as possible.

Still working on it, I found a platform where there were some timing 
problems and am looking into it.

If your SMSC changes are so important and critical, get them applied to 
the "net" tree, your patch posting makes no mention of which netdev tree 
you are targeting.
-- 
Florian