netdev - [PATCH net 4/4] net/smc: fix sock refcounting in case of termination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200903195318.39288-5-kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu,  3 Sep 2020 21:53:18 +0200
From:   Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
        ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net 4/4] net/smc: fix sock refcounting in case of termination

From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>

When an ISM device is removed, all its linkgroups are terminated,
i.e. all the corresponding connections are killed.
Connection killing invokes smc_close_active_abort(), which decreases
the sock refcount for certain states to simulate passive closing.
And it cancels the close worker and has to give up the sock lock for
this timeframe. This opens the door for a passive close worker or a
socket close to run in between. In this case smc_close_active_abort() and
passive close worker resp. smc_release() might do a sock_put for passive
closing. This causes:

[ 1323.315943] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[ 1323.316055] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 54469 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe8/0x130
[ 1323.316069] Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
[ 1323.316084] CPU: 3 PID: 54469 Comm: uperf Not tainted 5.9.0-20200826.rc2.git0.46328853ed20.300.fc32.s390x+debug #1
[ 1323.316096] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 702 (z/VM 6.4.0)
[ 1323.316108] Call Trace:
[ 1323.316125]  [<00000000c0d4aae8>] show_stack+0x90/0xf8
[ 1323.316143]  [<00000000c15989b0>] dump_stack+0xa8/0xe8
[ 1323.316158]  [<00000000c0d8344e>] panic+0x11e/0x288
[ 1323.316173]  [<00000000c0d83144>] __warn+0xac/0x158
[ 1323.316187]  [<00000000c1597a7a>] report_bug+0xb2/0x130
[ 1323.316201]  [<00000000c0d36424>] monitor_event_exception+0x44/0xc0
[ 1323.316219]  [<00000000c195c716>] pgm_check_handler+0x1da/0x238
[ 1323.316234]  [<00000000c151844c>] refcount_warn_saturate+0xec/0x130
[ 1323.316280] ([<00000000c1518448>] refcount_warn_saturate+0xe8/0x130)
[ 1323.316310]  [<000003ff801f2e2a>] smc_release+0x192/0x1c8 [smc]
[ 1323.316323]  [<00000000c169f1fa>] __sock_release+0x5a/0xe0
[ 1323.316334]  [<00000000c169f2ac>] sock_close+0x2c/0x40
[ 1323.316350]  [<00000000c1086de0>] __fput+0xb8/0x278
[ 1323.316362]  [<00000000c0db1e0e>] task_work_run+0x76/0xb8
[ 1323.316393]  [<00000000c0d8ab84>] do_exit+0x26c/0x520
[ 1323.316408]  [<00000000c0d8af08>] do_group_exit+0x48/0xc0
[ 1323.316421]  [<00000000c0d8afa8>] __s390x_sys_exit_group+0x28/0x38
[ 1323.316433]  [<00000000c195c32c>] system_call+0xe0/0x2b4
[ 1323.316446] 1 lock held by uperf/54469:
[ 1323.316456]  #0: 0000000044125e60 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release+0x44/0xe0

The patch rechecks sock state in smc_close_active_abort() after
smc_close_cancel_work() to avoid duplicate decrease of sock
refcount for the same purpose.

Fixes: 611b63a12732 ("net/smc: cancel tx worker in case of socket aborts")
Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_close.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index 290270c821ca..35e30d39510d 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ static void smc_close_cancel_work(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	cancel_work_sync(&smc->conn.close_work);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&smc->conn.tx_work);
 	lock_sock(sk);
-	sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
 }
 
 /* terminate smc socket abnormally - active abort
@@ -134,22 +133,22 @@ void smc_close_active_abort(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	}
 	switch (sk->sk_state) {
 	case SMC_ACTIVE:
-		sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERABORTWAIT;
-		smc_close_cancel_work(smc);
-		sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
-		sock_put(sk); /* passive closing */
-		break;
 	case SMC_APPCLOSEWAIT1:
 	case SMC_APPCLOSEWAIT2:
+		sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERABORTWAIT;
 		smc_close_cancel_work(smc);
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_PEERABORTWAIT)
+			break;
 		sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
-		sock_put(sk); /* postponed passive closing */
+		sock_put(sk); /* (postponed) passive closing */
 		break;
 	case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1:
 	case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2:
 	case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT:
 		sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERABORTWAIT;
 		smc_close_cancel_work(smc);
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_PEERABORTWAIT)
+			break;
 		sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
 		smc_conn_free(&smc->conn);
 		release_clcsock = true;
@@ -159,6 +158,8 @@ void smc_close_active_abort(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	case SMC_APPFINCLOSEWAIT:
 		sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERABORTWAIT;
 		smc_close_cancel_work(smc);
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_PEERABORTWAIT)
+			break;
 		sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
 		smc_conn_free(&smc->conn);
 		release_clcsock = true;
-- 
2.17.1