[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c01f9e0-fde4-a8ee-caa3-598738a9a98d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 09:24:50 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sch_generic: aviod concurrent reset and
enqueue op for lockless qdisc
On 9/2/20 6:14 PM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> It seems semantics for some_qdisc_is_busy() is changed, which does not only do
> the checking, but also do the reseting?
Yes, obviously, we would have to rename to a better name.
>
> Also, qdisc_reset() could be called multi times for the same qdisc if some_qdisc_is_busy()
> return true multi times?
This should not matter, qdisc_reset() can be called multiple times,
as we also call it from qdisc_destroy() anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists