[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200904143648.GA3212511@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:36:48 +0200
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Nuernberger, Stefan" <snu@...zon.de>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com" <orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Shah, Amit" <aams@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/packet: fix overflow in tpacket_rcv
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 02:22:46PM +0000, Nuernberger, Stefan wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 16:16 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:30:52PM +0200, Stefan Nuernberger wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Or Cohen <orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com>
> > >
> > > Using tp_reserve to calculate netoff can overflow as
> > > tp_reserve is unsigned int and netoff is unsigned short.
> > >
> > > This may lead to macoff receving a smaller value then
> > > sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr), and if po->has_vnet_hdr
> > > is set, an out-of-bounds write will occur when
> > > calling virtio_net_hdr_from_skb.
> > >
> > > The bug is fixed by converting netoff to unsigned int
> > > and checking if it exceeds USHRT_MAX.
> > >
> > > This addresses CVE-2020-14386
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8913336a7e8d ("packet: add PACKET_RESERVE sockopt")
> > > Signed-off-by: Or Cohen <orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > [ snu: backported to 4.9, changed tp_drops counting/locking ]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Nuernberger <snu@...zon.com>
> > > CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> > > CC: Amit Shah <aams@...zon.com>
> > > CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > net/packet/af_packet.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> >
>
> Sorry, this isn't merged on Linus' tree yet. It's a heads up that the
> backport isn't straightforward.
Ok, please be more specific about this when sending patches out...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists