[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <072865141ce38105a12f47051585dc8deca2b3e0.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:12:48 +0000
From: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] udp_tunnel: convert Intel drivers with
shared tables
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 16:22 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:06:15 +0000 Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:22 -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 18:27 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > This set converts Intel drivers which have the ability to spawn
> > > > multiple netdevs, but have only one UDP tunnel port table.
> > > >
> > > > Appropriate support is added to the core infra in patch 1,
> > > > followed by netdevsim support and a selftest.
> > > >
> > > > The table sharing works by core attaching the same table
> > > > structure to all devices sharing the table. This means the
> > > > reference count has to accommodate potentially large values.
> > > >
> > > > Once core is ready i40e and ice are converted. These are
> > > > complex drivers, and I don't have HW to test so please
> > > > review..
> > >
> > > I'm requesting our developers to take a look over and validation
> > > to
> > > test the ice and i40e patches. I will report back when I get
> > > results.
> >
> > Would you mind if I pick these patches up into Jeff's tree? It will
> > make it easier to test that way.
>
> It's been a month. Any ETA on these?
Sorry for taking so long. Let me check on the status and get back to
you.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists