[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cf621da-c917-bd4c-6d30-e8f145a24628@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 21:00:13 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Ensure that MDIO diversion is
used
On 9/3/2020 3:03 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> The firmware provides the Device Tree but here is the relevant section for
>> you pasted below. The problematic device is a particular revision of the
>> silicon (D0) which got later fixed (E0) however the Device Tree was created
>> after the fixed platform, not the problematic one. Both revisions of the
>> silicon are in production.
>>
>> There should have been an internal MDIO bus created for that chip revision
>> such that we could have correctly parented phy@0 (bcm53125 below) as child
>> node of the internal MDIO bus, but you have to realize that this was done
>> back in 2014 when DSA was barely revived as an active subsystem. The
>> BCM53125 node should have have been converted to an actual switch node at
>> some point, I use a mdio_boardinfo overlay downstream to support the switch
>> as a proper b53/DSA switch, anyway.
>
> I was expecting something like that. I think this patch needs a
> comment in the code explaining it is a workaround for a DT blob which
> cannot be changed. Maybe also make it conditional on the board
> compatible string?
It is already targeted at the Broadcom pseudo PHY address (30) which is
the one that needs diversion, I will update the patch description
accordingly though.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists