lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:10:01 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  mm/filemap.c

between commit:

  76cd61739fd1 ("mm/error_inject: Fix allow_error_inject function signatures.")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  2cb138387ead ("mm/filemap: fix storing to a THP shadow entry")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc mm/filemap.c
index 78d07a712112,054d93a86f8a..000000000000
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@@ -827,10 -827,10 +827,10 @@@ int replace_page_cache_page(struct pag
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(replace_page_cache_page);
  
- static int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
- 				      struct address_space *mapping,
- 				      pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp,
- 				      void **shadowp)
+ noinline int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
+ 					struct address_space *mapping,
 -					pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp_mask,
++					pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp,
+ 					void **shadowp)
  {
  	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, offset);
  	int huge = PageHuge(page);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists