lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:09:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: ale: switch to use tables for vlan entry description On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 02:09:23 +0300 Grygorii Strashko wrote: > The ALE VLAN entries are too much differ between different TI CPSW ALE > versions. So, handling them using flags, defines and get/set functions > became over-complicated. > > This patch introduces tables to describe the ALE VLAN entries fields, which > are different between TI CPSW ALE versions, and new get/set access > functions. It also allows to detect incorrect access to not available ALL > entry fields. When building with W=1 C=1: drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c:179:28: warning: symbol 'vlan_entry_cpsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c:187:28: warning: symbol 'vlan_entry_nu' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c:63: warning: Function parameter or member 'num_bits' not described in 'ale_entry_fld'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists