[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200906090557.GB2785@lore-desk>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 11:05:57 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Shay Agroskin <shayagr@...zon.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, brouer@...hat.com,
echaudro@...hat.com, sameehj@...zon.com, kuba@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: mvneta: update mb bit before
passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
[...]
> > rx_desc->buf_phys_addr,
> > len, dma_dir);
> > - if (data_len > 0 && sinfo->nr_frags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> > - skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags];
> > + if (data_len > 0 && *nfrags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> > + skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[*nfrags];
> > skb_frag_off_set(frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);
> > skb_frag_size_set(frag, data_len);
> > __skb_frag_set_page(frag, page);
> > - sinfo->nr_frags++;
> > + *nfrags = *nfrags + 1;
>
> nit, why do you use nfrags variable instead of sinfo->nr_frags (as it was
> before this patch) ?
> You doesn't seem to use the nfrags variable in the
> caller function and you update nr_frags as well.
> If it's used in a different patch (haven't
> reviewed it all yet), maybe move it to that patch ? (sorry in
> advance if I missed the logic here)
nfrags pointer is used to avoid the sinfo->nr_frags initialization in
mvneta_swbm_rx_frame() since skb_shared_info is not in the cache usually.
AFAIK the hw does not provide the info "this is the second descriptor" but
just "this the frist/last descriptor".
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > +
> > + if (rx_desc->status & MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC) {
> > + sinfo->nr_frags = *nfrags;
> > + xdp->mb = true;
> > + }
> > rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = 0;
> > ...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists