lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 6 Sep 2020 12:25:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] bnxt_en: Fix NULL ptr dereference crash in
 bnxt_fw_reset_task()

On Sat,  5 Sep 2020 22:55:37 -0400 Michael Chan wrote:
> From: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
> 
> bnxt_fw_reset_task() which runs from a workqueue can race with
> bnxt_remove_one().  For example, if firmware reset and VF FLR are
> happening at about the same time.
> 
> bnxt_remove_one() already cancels the workqueue and waits for it
> to finish, but we need to do this earlier before the devlink
> reporters are destroyed.  This will guarantee that
> the devlink reporters will always be valid when bnxt_fw_reset_task()
> is still running.
> 
> Fixes: b148bb238c02 ("bnxt_en: Fix possible crash in bnxt_fw_reset_task().")
> Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index 619eb55..8eb73fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -11779,6 +11779,10 @@ static void bnxt_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (BNXT_PF(bp))
>  		bnxt_sriov_disable(bp);
>  
> +	clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_FW_RESET, &bp->state);
> +	bnxt_cancel_sp_work(bp);
> +	bp->sp_event = 0;
> +
>  	bnxt_dl_fw_reporters_destroy(bp, true);
>  	if (BNXT_PF(bp))
>  		devlink_port_type_clear(&bp->dl_port);
> @@ -11786,9 +11790,6 @@ static void bnxt_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	unregister_netdev(dev);
>  	bnxt_dl_unregister(bp);
>  	bnxt_shutdown_tc(bp);
> -	clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_FW_RESET, &bp->state);
> -	bnxt_cancel_sp_work(bp);
> -	bp->sp_event = 0;
>  
>  	bnxt_clear_int_mode(bp);
>  	bnxt_hwrm_func_drv_unrgtr(bp);

devlink can itself scheduler a recovery via:

  bnxt_fw_fatal_recover() -> bnxt_fw_reset()

no? Maybe don't make the devlink recovery path need to go via a
workqueue?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ