[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef0a8665-39e1-fd8f-32ce-4c597f54a8c8@solarflare.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:14:20 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] sfc: don't double-down() filters in
ef100_reset()
dev_close(), by way of ef100_net_stop(), already brings down the filter
table, so there's no need to do it again (which just causes lots of
WARN_ONs).
Similarly, don't bring it up ourselves, as dev_open() -> ef100_net_open()
will do it, and will fail if it's already been brought up.
Fixes: a9dc3d5612ce ("sfc_ef100: RX filter table management and related gubbins")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
index 19fe86b3b316..9cf5b8f8fab9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
@@ -428,24 +428,12 @@ static int ef100_reset(struct efx_nic *efx, enum reset_type reset_type)
__clear_bit(reset_type, &efx->reset_pending);
rc = dev_open(efx->net_dev, NULL);
} else if (reset_type == RESET_TYPE_ALL) {
- /* A RESET_TYPE_ALL will cause filters to be removed, so we remove filters
- * and reprobe after reset to avoid removing filters twice
- */
- down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
- ef100_filter_table_down(efx);
- up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
rc = efx_mcdi_reset(efx, reset_type);
if (rc)
return rc;
netif_device_attach(efx->net_dev);
- down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
- rc = ef100_filter_table_up(efx);
- up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
rc = dev_open(efx->net_dev, NULL);
} else {
rc = 1; /* Leave the device closed */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists