lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:26:48 +0300
From:   Aya Levin <ayal@...dia.com>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v1 3/4] devlink: Add hierarchy between traps
 in device level and port level



On 9/6/2020 6:58 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:32:13PM +0300, Aya Levin wrote:
>> Managing large scale port's traps may be complicated. This patch
>> introduces a shortcut: when setting a trap on a device and this trap is
>> not registered on this device, the action will take place on all related
>> ports that did register this trap.
> 
> I'm not really a fan of this and I'm not sure there is precedent for
> something similar. Also, it's an optimization, so I wouldn't put it as
> part of the first submission before you gather some operational
> experience with the initial interface.

I thought it was a nice idea but I agree that this is an optimization 
and can be dropped from preliminary submission
> 
> In addition, I find it very unintuitive for users. When I do 'devlink
> trap show' I will not see anything. I will only see the traps when I
> issue 'devlink port trap show', yet 'devlink trap set ...' is expected
> to work.
> 
> Lets assume that this is a valid change, it would be better implemented
> with my suggestion from the previous patch: When devlink sees that a
> trap is registered on all the ports it can auto-register a new
> per-device trap and user space gets the appropriate notification.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/devlink.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>> index b13e1b40bf1c..dea5482b2517 100644
>> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> @@ -6501,23 +6501,46 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_trap_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>   	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>>   	struct devlink_trap_mngr *trap_mngr;
>>   	struct devlink_trap_item *trap_item;
>> +	struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
>>   	int err;
>>   
>> -	trap_mngr = devlink_trap_get_trap_mngr_from_info(devlink, info);
>> -	if (list_empty(&trap_mngr->trap_list))
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	devlink_port = devlink_port_get_from_attrs(devlink, info->attrs);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(devlink_port)) {
>> +		trap_mngr =  &devlink->trap_mngr;
>> +		if (list_empty(&trap_mngr->trap_list))
>> +			goto loop_over_ports;
>>   
>> -	trap_item = devlink_trap_item_get_from_info(trap_mngr, info);
>> -	if (!trap_item) {
>> -		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Device did not register this trap");
>> -		return -ENOENT;
>> +		trap_item = devlink_trap_item_get_from_info(trap_mngr, info);
>> +		if (!trap_item)
>> +			goto loop_over_ports;
>> +	} else {
>> +		trap_mngr = &devlink_port->trap_mngr;
>> +		if (list_empty(&trap_mngr->trap_list))
>> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +		trap_item = devlink_trap_item_get_from_info(trap_mngr, info);
>> +		if (!trap_item) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port did not register this trap");
>> +			return -ENOENT;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   	return devlink_trap_action_set(devlink, trap_mngr, trap_item, info);
>>   
>> -	err = devlink_trap_action_set(devlink, trap_mngr, trap_item, info);
>> -	if (err)
>> -		return err;
>> +loop_over_ports:
>> +	if (list_empty(&devlink->port_list))
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	list_for_each_entry(devlink_port, &devlink->port_list, list) {
>> +		trap_mngr = &devlink_port->trap_mngr;
>> +		if (list_empty(&trap_mngr->trap_list))
>> +			continue;
>>   
>> +		trap_item = devlink_trap_item_get_from_info(trap_mngr, info);
>> +		if (!trap_item)
>> +			continue;
>> +		err = devlink_trap_action_set(devlink, trap_mngr, trap_item, info);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>> +	}
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.14.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists