netdev - Re: [PATCH for-next] net: provide __sys_shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200907095813.4cdacb5c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:58:13 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] net: provide __sys_shutdown_sock() that takes
 a socket

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:45:00 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/6/20 11:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 04:05:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:  
> >> There's a trivial io_uring patch that depends on this one. If this one
> >> is acceptable to you, I'd like to queue it up in the io_uring branch for
> >> 5.10.  
> > 
> > Can you give it a better name?  These __ names re just horrible.
> > sock_shutdown_sock?  
> 
> Sure, I don't really care, just following what is mostly done already. And
> it is meant to be internal in the sense that it's not exported to modules.
> 
> I'll let the net guys pass the final judgement on that, I'm obviously fine
> with anything in terms of naming :-)

So am I :) But if Christoph prefers sock_shutdown_sock() let's use that.