lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:55:01 -0400
From:   Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] Support for VLAN interface over HSR/PRP

Hi Willem,

On 9/4/20 11:52 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:30 AM Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> On 9/2/20 12:14 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> On 9/1/20 3:54 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>> This series add support for creating VLAN interface over HSR or
>>>> PRP interface. Typically industrial networks uses VLAN in
>>>> deployment and this capability is needed to support these
>>>> networks.
>>>>
>>>> This is tested using two TI AM572x IDK boards connected back
>>>> to back over CPSW  ports (eth0 and eth1).
>>>>
>>>> Following is the setup
>>>>
>>>>                   Physical Setup
>>>>                   ++++++++++++++
>>>>    _______________    (CPSW)     _______________
>>>>    |              |----eth0-----|               |
>>>>    |TI AM572x IDK1|             | TI AM572x IDK2|
>>>>    |______________|----eth1-----|_______________|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                   Network Topolgy
>>>>                   +++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>>                          TI AM571x IDK  TI AM572x IDK
>>>>
>>>> 192.168.100.10                 CPSW ports                 192.168.100.20
>>>>                IDK-1                                        IDK-2
>>>> hsr0/prp0.100--| 192.168.2.10  |--eth0--| 192.168.2.20 |--hsr0/prp0.100
>>>>                  |----hsr0/prp0--|        |---hsr0/prp0--|
>>>> hsr0/prp0.101--|               |--eth1--|              |--hsr0/prp0/101
>>>>
>>>> 192.168.101.10                                            192.168.101.20
>>>>
>>>> Following tests:-
>>>>    - create hsr or prp interface and ping the interface IP address
>>>>      and verify ping is successful.
>>>>    - Create 2 VLANs over hsr or prp interface on both IDKs (VID 100 and
>>>>      101). Ping between the IP address of the VLAN interfaces
>>>>    - Do iperf UDP traffic test with server on one IDK and client on the
>>>>      other. Do this using 100 and 101 subnet IP addresses
>>>>    - Dump /proc/net/vlan/{hsr|prp}0.100 and verify frames are transmitted
>>>>      and received at these interfaces.
>>>>    - Delete the vlan and hsr/prp interface and verify interfaces are
>>>>      removed cleanly.
>>>>
>>>> Logs for IDK-1 at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/NxF83yZFDX/
>>>> Logs for IDK-2 at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/YBXBcsPgVK/
>>>>
>>>> Murali Karicheri (1):
>>>>     net: hsr/prp: add vlan support
>>>>
>>>>    net/hsr/hsr_device.c  |  4 ----
>>>>    net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>>>>    2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> I am not sure if the packet flow is right for this?
>>>
>>> VLAN over HSR frame format is like this.
>>>
>>> <Start of Frame><VLAN tag><HSR Tag><IP><CRC>
>>>
>>> My ifconfig stats shows both hsr and hsr0.100 interfaces receiving
>>> frames.
>>>
>>> So I did a WARN_ON() in HSR driver before frame is forwarded to upper
>>> layer.
>>>
>>> a0868495local@...0868495:~/Projects/upstream-kernel$ git diff
>>> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>>> index de21df30b0d9..545a3cd8c71b 100644
>>> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>>> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>>> @@ -415,9 +415,11 @@ static void hsr_forward_do(struct hsr_frame_info
>>> *frame)
>>>                   }
>>>
>>>                   skb->dev = port->dev;
>>> -               if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
>>> +               if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER) {
>>> +                       if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb))
>>> +                               WARN_ON(1);
>>>                           hsr_deliver_master(skb, port->dev,
>>> frame->node_src);
>>> -               else
>>> +               } else
>>>                           hsr_xmit(skb, port, frame);
>>>           }
>>>    }
>>>
>>> And I get the trace shown below.
>>>
>>> [  275.125431] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/hsr/hsr_forward.c:420
>>> hsr_forward_skb+0x460/0x564
>>> [  275.133822] Modules linked in: snd_soc_omap_hdmi snd_soc_ti_sdma
>>> snd_soc_core snd_pcm_dmaengine snd_pcm snd_time4
>>> [  275.199705] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
>>> 5.9.0-rc1-00658-g473e463812c2-dirty #8
>>> [  275.209573] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
>>> [  275.215703] [<c011177c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b6f0>]
>>> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>> [  275.223487] [<c010b6f0>] (show_stack) from [<c055690c>]
>>> (dump_stack+0xc4/0xe4)
>>> [  275.230747] [<c055690c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01386ac>]
>>> (__warn+0xc0/0xf4)
>>> [  275.237656] [<c01386ac>] (__warn) from [<c0138a3c>]
>>> (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x58/0xb8)
>>> [  275.245177] [<c0138a3c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c09564bc>]
>>> (hsr_forward_skb+0x460/0x564)
>>> [  275.253657] [<c09564bc>] (hsr_forward_skb) from [<c0955534>]
>>> (hsr_handle_frame+0x15c/0x190)
>>> [  275.262047] [<c0955534>] (hsr_handle_frame) from [<c07c6704>]
>>> (__netif_receive_skb_core+0x23c/0xc88)
>>> [  275.271223] [<c07c6704>] (__netif_receive_skb_core) from [<c07c7180>]
>>> (__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x30/0x74)
>>> [  275.281266] [<c07c7180>] (__netif_receive_skb_one_core) from
>>> [<c07c72a4>] (netif_receive_skb+0x50/0x1c4)
>>> [  275.290793] [<c07c72a4>] (netif_receive_skb) from [<c071a55c>]
>>> (cpsw_rx_handler+0x230/0x308)
>>> [  275.299272] [<c071a55c>] (cpsw_rx_handler) from [<c0715ee8>]
>>> (__cpdma_chan_process+0xf4/0x188)
>>> [  275.307925] [<c0715ee8>] (__cpdma_chan_process) from [<c0717294>]
>>> (cpdma_chan_process+0x3c/0x5c)
>>> [  275.316754] [<c0717294>] (cpdma_chan_process) from [<c071dd14>]
>>> (cpsw_rx_mq_poll+0x44/0x98)
>>> [  275.325145] [<c071dd14>] (cpsw_rx_mq_poll) from [<c07c8ae0>]
>>> (net_rx_action+0xf0/0x400)
>>> [  275.333185] [<c07c8ae0>] (net_rx_action) from [<c0101370>]
>>> (__do_softirq+0xf0/0x3ac)
>>> [  275.340965] [<c0101370>] (__do_softirq) from [<c013f5ec>]
>>> (irq_exit+0xa8/0xe4)
>>> [  275.348224] [<c013f5ec>] (irq_exit) from [<c0199344>]
>>> (__handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xe0)
>>> [  275.356093] [<c0199344>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c056f8fc>]
>>> (gic_handle_irq+0x4c/0xa8)
>>> [  275.364481] [<c056f8fc>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0100b6c>]
>>> (__irq_svc+0x6c/0x90)
>>> [  275.371996] Exception stack(0xc0e01f18 to 0xc0e01f60)
>>>
>>> Shouldn't it show vlan_do_receive() ?
>>>
>>>       if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
>>>           if (pt_prev) {
>>>               ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
>>>               pt_prev = NULL;
>>>           }
>>>           if (vlan_do_receive(&skb))
>>>               goto another_round;
>>>           else if (unlikely(!skb))
>>>               goto out;
>>>       }
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> I did an ftrace today and I find vlan_do_receive() is called for the
>> incoming frames before passing SKB to hsr_handle_frame(). If someone
>> can review this, it will help. Thanks.
>>
>> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/CbRzXjwjR5/
> 
> hsr_handle_frame is an rx_handler called after
> __netif_receive_skb_core called vlan_do_receive and jumped back to
> another_round.

Yes. hsr_handle_frame() is a rx_handler() after the above code that
does vlan_do_receive(). The ftrace shows vlan_do_receive() is called
followed by call to hsr_handle_frame(). From ifconfig I can see both
hsr and vlan interface stats increments by same count. So I assume,
vlan_do_receive() is called initially and it removes the tag, update
stats and then return true and go for another round. Do you think that
is the case?

vlan_do_receive() calls vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_proto, vlan_id)
to retrieve the real netdevice (real device). However VLAN device is
attached to hsr device (real device), but SKB will have HSR slave 
Ethernet netdevice (in our case it is cpsw device) and vlan_find_dev()
would have failed since there is no vlan_info in cpsw netdev struct. So
below code  in vlan_do_receive() should have failed and return false.

	vlan_dev = vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_proto, vlan_id);
	if (!vlan_dev)
		return false;

So how does it goes for another_round ? May be vlan_find_dev is
finding the hsr netdevice?

I am not an expert and so the question. Probably I can put a
traceprintk() to confirm this, but if someone can clarify this
it will be great. But for that, I will spin v2 with the above comments
addressed as in my reply and post.

Thanks
> 
> That's how it should work right?
> 

-- 
Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments

Powered by blists - more mailing lists