netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dp83869: Add speed optimization feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9848c3ee-51c2-2e06-a51b-3aacc1384557@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:07:22 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dp83869: Add speed optimization
 feature

Jakub

On 9/5/20 1:38 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 06:42:59 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote:
>> +static int dp83869_set_downshift(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 cnt)
>> +{
>> +	int val, count;
>> +
>> +	if (cnt > DP83869_DOWNSHIFT_8_COUNT)
>> +		return -E2BIG;
> ERANGE

This is not checking a range but making sure it is not bigger then 8.

IMO I would use ERANGE if the check was a boundary check for upper and 
lower bounds.

Dan