netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:57:03 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for map_ptr arithmetic

Change selftest map_ptr_kern.c with disabling inlining for
one of subtests, which will fail the test without previous
verifier change. Also added to verifier test for both
"map_ptr += scalar" and "scalar += map_ptr" arithmetic.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c        | 10 +++++-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c  | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
index 982a2d8aa844..0b754106407d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
@@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ static inline int check_default(struct bpf_map *indirect,
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static __attribute__ ((noinline)) int
+check_default_noinline(struct bpf_map *indirect, struct bpf_map *direct)
+{
+	VERIFY(check(indirect, direct, sizeof(__u32), sizeof(__u32),
+		     MAX_ENTRIES));
+	return 1;
+}
+
 typedef struct {
 	int counter;
 } atomic_t;
@@ -107,7 +115,7 @@ static inline int check_hash(void)
 	struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)&m_hash;
 	int i;
 
-	VERIFY(check_default(&hash->map, map));
+	VERIFY(check_default_noinline(&hash->map, map));
 
 	VERIFY(hash->n_buckets == MAX_ENTRIES);
 	VERIFY(hash->elem_size == 64);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
index b52209db8250..637f9293bda8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
@@ -60,3 +60,35 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 1,
 },
+{
+	"bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
-- 
2.24.1