lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 23:43:02 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next + leds v2 1/7] dt-bindings: leds: document
 binding for HW controlled LEDs

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:31:22 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:07:26PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:59:23 -0600
> > Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know :) I copied this from other drivers, I once tried setting
> > > > up environment for doing checking of device trees with YAML schemas,
> > > > and it was a little painful :)    
> > > 
> > > pip3 install dtschema ?
> > > 
> > > Can you elaborate on the issue.
> > > 
> > > Rob
> > >   
> > 
> > I am using Gentoo and didn't want to bloat system with non-portage
> > packages, nor try to start a virtual environment. In the end I did it
> > in a chroot Ubuntu :)  
> 
> A user install doesn't work?
> 
> I don't really care for virtual env either.
> 
> > The other thing is that the make dt_binding_check executed for
> > quite a long time, and I didn't find a way to just do the binding check
> > some of the schemas.  
> 
> It's a bit faster now with what's queued for 5.10. The schema 
> validation is under 10sec now on my laptop. For the examples, any 
> new schema could apply to any example, so we have to check them all. 
> It's faster too, but still minutes to run.
> 
> > But I am not criticizing anything, I think that it is a good thing to
> > have this system.  
> 
> Good to hear. Just want to improve any pain points if possible.
> 
> Rob
> 

OK I am running it now in my chroot environment :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists