netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/6] net: marvell: prestera: Add driver for Prestera family ASIC devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf9DJZhOMcaAebtQoz_biY1kFS34W1Fp0kdDFiDm4T7vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:28:35 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@...ision.eu>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
        Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@...ision.eu>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/6] net: marvell: prestera: Add driver for
 Prestera family ASIC devices

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:25 AM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:12:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:52 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu> wrote:


> > > +               .param = {.admin_state = admin_state}
> >
> > + white spaces? Whatever you choose, just be consistent among all
> > similar definitions.
> >
>
> Can I use following format for one-liner embedded struct ?

Of course. It's just a style matter.
My point that you need to be consistent over all similar cases in the code.

>         .param = {
>                 .admin_state = admin_state,
>         }
> > ...
> >
>
> I think it looks better when all of the members filled looks similar
> (even if it requires 2 additional lines) instead of having:
>
>     .member = { E } ?

I like the former one (as you do), but in some cases when you have one
member or an array it's convenient to have them one one line.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko