[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200910180257.GD3354160@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:02:57 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: phy: dp83869: support Wake on LAN
> > > static int dp83869_config_port_mirroring(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > > {
> > > struct dp83869_private *dp83869 = phydev->priv;
> > Overall this code looks quite similar to dp83867, is there no way to
> > factor this out?
>
> Factor what out? Yes the DP83867 and DP83869 are very similar in registers
> and bitmaps. They just differ in their feature sets.
>
> The WoL code was copied and pasted to the 869 and I would like to keep the
> two files as similar as I can as it will be easier to fix and find bugs.
It will be even easier if they shared the same code. You could create
a library of functions, like bcm-phy-lib.c.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists