netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/9] bpf: change logging calls from verbose() to bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZ-K7Myp7_2a==ic5y+TRCFL4Gf4gGWwqm8yAb0icOi5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:03:03 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/9] bpf: change logging calls from verbose()
 to bpf_log() and use log pointer

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:13 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>
> In preparation for moving code around, change a bunch of references to
> env->log (and the verbose() logging helper) to use bpf_log() and a direct
> pointer to struct bpf_verifier_log. While we're touching the function
> signature, mark the 'prog' argument to bpf_check_type_match() as const.
>
> Also enhance the bpf_verifier_log_needed() check to handle NULL pointers
> for the log struct so we can re-use the code with logging disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
> ---

Only 4 out of 9 emails arrived, can you please resubmit your entire
patch set again?

>  include/linux/bpf.h          |    2 +-
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |    5 +++-
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c             |    6 +++--
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>

[...]