[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200910.131355.396733870871815643.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jacob.e.keller@...el.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com, kuba@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, michael.chan@...adcom.com, luobin9@...wei.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
danieller@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 0/5] devlink flash update overwrite mask
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:26:48 -0700
> This series introduces support for a new attribute to the flash update
> command: DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_OVERWRITE_MASK.
I think you really need to get rid of BIT() usage in the UAPI
header as Jakub mentioned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists