netdev - [PATCH net-next] net: try to avoid unneeded backlog flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0d64ac9b321104d58270822c204845ccb31368f8.1599747321.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:20:57 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: try to avoid unneeded backlog flush

flush_all_backlogs() may cause deadlock on systems
running processes with FIFO scheduling policy.

The above is critical in -RT scenarios, where user-space
specifically ensure no network activity is scheduled on
the CPU running the mentioned FIFO process, but still get
stuck.

This commit tries to address the problem checking the
backlog status on the remote CPUs before scheduling the
flush operation. If the backlog is empty, we can skip it.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 152ad3b578de..fdef40bf4b88 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5621,17 +5621,59 @@ static void flush_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
 	local_bh_enable();
 }
 
+static bool flush_required(int cpu)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS)
+	struct softnet_data *sd = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
+	bool do_flush;
+
+	local_irq_disable();
+	rps_lock(sd);
+
+	/* as insertion into process_queue happens with the rps lock held,
+	 * process_queue access may race only with dequeue
+	 */
+	do_flush = !skb_queue_empty(&sd->input_pkt_queue) ||
+		   !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sd->process_queue);
+	rps_unlock(sd);
+	local_irq_enable();
+
+	return do_flush;
+#endif
+	/* without RPS we can't safely check input_pkt_queue: during a
+	 * concurrent remote skb_queue_splice() we can detect as empty both
+	 * input_pkt_queue and process_queue even if the latter could end-up
+	 * containing a lot of packets.
+	 */
+	return true;
+}
+
 static void flush_all_backlogs(void)
 {
+	static cpumask_t flush_cpus  = { CPU_BITS_NONE };
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
+	/* since we are under rtnl lock protection we can use static data
+	 * for the cpumask and avoid allocating on stack the possibly
+	 * large mask
+	 */
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
 	get_online_cpus();
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
-		queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq,
-			      per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, cpu));
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (flush_required(cpu)) {
+			queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq,
+				      per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, cpu));
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus);
+		}
+	}
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+	/* we can have in flight packet[s] on the cpus we are not flushing,
+	 * synchronize_net() in rollback_registered_many() will take care of
+	 * them
+	 */
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus)
 		flush_work(per_cpu_ptr(&flush_works, cpu));
 
 	put_online_cpus();
-- 
2.26.2