netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] sfc: de-indirect TSO handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:01:46 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc:     <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] sfc: de-indirect TSO handling

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:33:11 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> index 078c7ec2a70e..272eb5ecb7e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ void ef100_tx_init(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue)
>  				    tx_queue->channel->channel -
>  				    tx_queue->efx->tx_channel_offset);
>  
> -	if (efx_mcdi_tx_init(tx_queue, false))
> +	tx_queue->tso_version = 3;
> +	if (efx_mcdi_tx_init(tx_queue))
>  		netdev_WARN(tx_queue->efx->net_dev,
>  			    "failed to initialise TXQ %d\n", tx_queue->queue);
>  }

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
> @@ -338,8 +338,18 @@ netdev_tx_t __efx_enqueue_skb(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue, struct sk_buff *skb
>  	 * size limit.
>  	 */
>  	if (segments) {
> -		EFX_WARN_ON_ONCE_PARANOID(!tx_queue->handle_tso);
> -		rc = tx_queue->handle_tso(tx_queue, skb, &data_mapped);
> +		switch (tx_queue->tso_version) {
> +		case 1:
> +			rc = efx_enqueue_skb_tso(tx_queue, skb, &data_mapped);
> +			break;
> +		case 2:
> +			rc = efx_ef10_tx_tso_desc(tx_queue, skb, &data_mapped);
> +			break;
> +		case 0: /* No TSO on this queue, SW fallback needed */
> +		default:
> +			rc = -EINVAL;
> +			break;
> +		}

Should tso_version 3 be handled in this switch?